(N)TSCGEWOEU vs (N)TSCGEWOU: MV Reeling Cable Comparison

(N)TSCGEWOEU vs (N)TSCGEWOU: What’s the Difference?

Both (N)TSCGEWOEU and (N)TSCGEWOU are medium voltage reeling and trailing cables for mining applications, manufactured to VDE 0250-813. The key difference is in the insulation material: (N)TSCGEWOEU uses EPR (ethylene propylene rubber) with “E” designation, while (N)TSCGEWOU uses a different rubber compound with “O” designation. This difference affects voltage rating, temperature performance, and application suitability.

TEBAOFLEX manufactures both types. View (N)TSCGEWOEU product page and our comparison guide below.

(N)TSCGEWOEU MT standard medium voltage reeling cable with red rubber sheath by TEBAOFLEX
(N)TSCGEWOEU MT cable with EPR insulation — the standard medium voltage reeling cable for mining applications up to 18/30kV

Designation Breakdown

Element(N)TSCGEWOEU(N)TSCGEWOU
(N)Neoprene (CR) rubber sheathNeoprene (CR) rubber sheath
TMining cable typeMining cable type
SScreened constructionScreened construction
CCopper wire screenCopper wire screen
GWith earth conductorWith earth conductor
E vs OE = EPR insulationO = OTR rubber compound
WRubber sheathRubber sheath
EU vs UEU = enhanced versionU = standard version
StandardVDE 0250-813VDE 0250-813
(N)TSCGEWOEU vs (N)TSCGEWOU cable material properties comparison showing rubber compound and construction differences
Material comparison: the “E” vs “O” designation indicates different insulation rubber compounds — EPR vs OTR — affecting electrical and thermal performance

Performance Comparison

Property(N)TSCGEWOEU (EPR)(N)TSCGEWOU (OTR)Advantage
Max voltage18/30kV12/20kVTSCGEWOEU
Max conductor temp90°C70°CTSCGEWOEU
Insulation typeEPROTR rubberTSCGEWOEU
Dielectric strengthHigherStandardTSCGEWOEU
Thermal agingExcellentGoodTSCGEWOEU
FlexibilityVery goodVery goodTie
Abrasion resistanceExcellentExcellentTie
Reeling flex lifeExcellentExcellentTie
Oil resistanceGoodGoodTie
CostHigherLowerTSCGEWOU
AvailabilityStandardWidely availableTSCGEWOU
(N)TSCGEWOEU vs (N)TSCGEWOU technical specification comparison table showing voltage rating conductor size and insulation differences
Specification comparison: (N)TSCGEWOEU offers higher voltage rating (up to 18/30kV) and higher conductor temperature (90°C) compared to (N)TSCGEWOU

When to Choose (N)TSCGEWOEU

  • High-voltage applications: Equipment rated above 12/20kV requires the EPR insulation of TSCGEWOEU
  • High-temperature environments: EPR allows 90°C continuous operation vs 70°C for OTR
  • VFD-driven equipment: EPR has superior dielectric properties for VFD switching transients
  • Heavy-duty trailing: The TSCGEWOEU-TR variant is designed for the heaviest open-pit mining
  • Long cable runs: Better dielectric strength supports longer runs at MV
  • Future-proofing: Higher thermal rating provides margin for load increases

When to Choose (N)TSCGEWOU

  • Standard voltage (up to 12/20kV): OTR insulation is sufficient for most mining MV applications
  • Cost-sensitive projects: Lower material cost for standard-duty applications
  • General reeling applications: Standard excavator and shovel power supply
  • Submersible variants: The TSCGEWOU submersible version for underwater mining
  • Underground mining: Standard underground equipment power supply at lower voltages
(N)TSCGEWOEU vs (N)TSCGEWOU cable application scenario comparison for open pit mining and submersible operations
Application scenarios: (N)TSCGEWOEU for high-voltage heavy-duty open-pit mining (left) vs (N)TSCGEWOU for standard-voltage and submersible applications (right)

Submersible Applications

For underwater mining and dredging, (N)TSCGEWOU is available in a specialized submersible variant rated for depths up to 300m. The EPR-insulated (N)TSCGEWOEU is generally not the first choice for submersion because:

  • Submersible applications typically operate at lower voltage (up to 12/20kV)
  • The OTR compound provides better water blocking properties
  • Submersible cables have specialized water-blocking construction features

However, for deep submersible applications requiring higher voltage, TEBAOFLEX can engineer (N)TSCGEWOEU submersible variants. Contact TEBAOFLEX for custom solutions.

Cost Comparison

(N)TSCGEWOEU typically costs 15-25% more than (N)TSCGEWOU due to:

  • Higher cost of EPR insulation compound
  • Higher voltage rating requires more stringent testing
  • Enhanced construction for 18/30kV variants

For applications where both cables are suitable (up to 12/20kV), evaluate whether the thermal and dielectric advantages of EPR justify the cost premium. For standard-duty mining at 6/10kV, (N)TSCGEWOU provides excellent value.

Summary: Which Cable Should You Choose?

If your application is…Recommended cable
Voltage above 12/20kV (up to 18/30kV)(N)TSCGEWOEU
High temperature operation (>70°C)(N)TSCGEWOEU
VFD-driven equipment(N)TSCGEWOEU EMV FC
Heavy-duty open-pit trailing(N)TSCGEWOEU-TR
Standard 6/10kV mining equipment(N)TSCGEWOU
Submersible applications(N)TSCGEWOU submersible
Cost-sensitive standard duty(N)TSCGEWOU

Contact TEBAOFLEX engineering for expert cable selection and competitive pricing on both (N)TSCGEWOEU and (N)TSCGEWOU cables.